In Chile, 2011 social manifestations soared with power never seen in the last three decades. People, leaded by students, marched through the streets within an inspiring force. More than once, 100.000 people marched in one single day at Santiago. Sebastian Piñera, the chilean president, had to give national speeches about it. Four ministers passed through the position. The fourth had been constitutionally accused. The whole society was talking about students manifestations: on the streets, at home, even at parties. So you must had an opinion about what was going on. I had mine.

For me, some questions remained without answer:

  • Is this really a big movement?
  • Why the students are so motivated?
  • Why profit is so bad at education?

I read and heard, but none of the answers where deep enough for me. So I jumped into thinking to find the principles that could explain the movement. I took enough time to give the answers that gave me peace of mind. In the core of that answers, I think, you could find answers to more aspects related with society.

Let me try to answer some questions:

  • Is This Really a Big Movement? 

The first thing you notice about the student mobilization is size, big one. Around 100.000 people marching on the streets (See 1) . Once, 500.000 gathered (See 2), two times the biggest mobilization made by students until now (See 3). So yes, this is a big movement. Not just that, is the biggest student mobilization at Chile, ever. Nowadays, not a single political party in Chile is able to gather those people. Indeed, if gathering people is a sign of representativity, this movement, is more representative than any political coalition. So it is a big movement and the government must take it seriously, and do something serious about it.

  • Why the students are so motivated? 

Other thing that is noticeable from the students movement is motivation. During these past two years, had been a lot of massive marches. Even today (See 4). So isn’t just an excuse to stay at home in cold mornings. Even I marched one or two of them. But, why are some thousands still marching?. Surely there are more than one reason. Let’s propose some.

Let’s says there are two reasons why someone could be very motivated/incentivated at something:

  • when you really want something that could be nice to achieve/obtain (forward motivation).
  • you feel deprived of something you already have or deserve (backward motivation or an attack).

Let’s add that the latter is stronger than the former.

With this, is obvious that the educational movement is boosted by the latter. That means, education is thought as a right; a right that has been taken away. Something that isn’t completely a lie, because, in Chile, there was a time when education was free of charge to the students. It is remembered with good quality too. It was a time when obtaining a grade used to depend on your efforts, not your daddy’s.

Why would education been considered as a right? Well, it is a right, at least, it is an Human Right.

Why would they feel attack? Because they think they are not playing a fair game. Why would they feel they are note playing a fair game? Because they see players with advantages. Even more, the advantaged are trying to block the non-advantaged.

If you consider education as a tool to participate and generate wealth to both; the individual and the society, why would you be private someone from education?. The only thing that I could imagine is when someone sees a possible benefit on it, as for example, advantage in a competitive society.

Someone could think that liberty is having multiple options, and choose one of them . What else gives more liberty than infinite options?. Considering that education gives you options, this is what you private someone if you don’t give him education. In other words, lack of educations is lack of freedom.

  • Why profit is so bad at education? 

As Michael J. Sandel noticed in What Money Can’t Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets, I believe that markets affects the value of the things traded, diminishing them. So if we consider education as a method to exploit the unique abilities from individuals to put them in service to society, why would we restrict that with money barriers?. So this is the answer: monetary profit in education led to barriers that restrict its purpose.

  1. There been four:  1) 30/06/11, 2)22/09/11, 3)28/06/12, 4)11/04/2013

  2. Not a in a march, but in a concert.
  3. Made in 2006 by pinguins
  4. 09/05/2013

Un pensamiento en “Education

  1. Pingback: John Stuart Mill (1806-1878) | dmorls

Deja una respuesta

Introduce tus datos o haz clic en un icono para iniciar sesión:

Logo de

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Salir /  Cambiar )

Imagen de Twitter

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Twitter. Salir /  Cambiar )

Foto de Facebook

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Facebook. Salir /  Cambiar )

Conectando a %s